Dyno Results | Project PencilGeek |
Vital Statistics | |
|
BMW E9x M3 (S65 Motor) Dynapack SAE (J1349) Download-1 |
Configuration (from Baseline) | |
|
|
Modification (since Baseline) | |
|
Measured Results: | ||||
|
247 FT/LBS 332 HP |
@ 3985 RPM @ 8055 RPM |
(334.9 NM) (336.6 PS) |
(34.15 KGM) (247.6 KW) |
Baseline Measurements: | ||||
|
246 FT/LBS 327 HP |
@ 4010 RPM @ 8150 RPM |
(333.5 NM) (331.5 PS) |
(34.01 KGM) (243.8 KW) |
Performance Gains: | ||||
|
1 FT/LBS 5 HP |
( 1.4 NM) ( 5.1 PS) |
(0.14 KGM) ( 3.7 KW) |
Dyno Graphs: |
Alternate Images: |
Individual Results |
Horsepower & Torque Delta |
Videos: |
Sound Pressure Level Comparison |
Gruppe-M Cold Air Intake (sound and sound pressure level, interior, windows up) |
Stock baseline (sound and sound pressure level, interior, windows up) |
Other images: |
SPL vs. RPM (Stock vs. Gruppe-M CAI) |
Product Review:
The Gruppe-M cold air intake looks fantastic, but doesn't really seal in the engine bay. The "seal" is made by screwing the molded air filter housing against the body of the car. A rubber seam in the filter housing mates with the body molding to make the seal. It doesn't seal nearly as nice as the factory unit, but makes up for it in the looks department. The Gruppe-M CAI it is fitted with a nice K&N air filter,
which probably flows much better than the stock unit. In my opinion,
it's the K&N air filter that accounts for any performance gains -- not the
unit design itself.
|